Scientists develop new blood test capable of detecting over 50 types of cancer early

A groundbreaking blood test capable of detecting more than 50 types of cancer has shown promising results in major clinical trials, accurately identifying the disease in nearly two-thirds of cases it flagged.

The test, known as Galleri, is being evaluated by the NHS as a potential annual screening tool. It works by detecting DNA fragments shed by cancer cells into the bloodstream—often revealing cancer before symptoms appear.

In a large U.S. trial called Pathfinder 2, Galleri demonstrated strong performance both in ruling out cancer in healthy individuals and in spotting the disease at earlier, more treatable stages. Among participants whose blood showed a “cancer signal,” 61.6% were later confirmed to have cancer. Impressively, the test also correctly identified the organ or tissue of origin in 92% of those cases—an achievement researchers say could save valuable time in diagnosis.

“We’re really very excited, and we think this is a further step along the way in really transforming cancer outcomes,” said Sir Harpal Kumar, President of International Business and BioPharma at Grail, the company behind Galleri, and former head of Cancer Research UK.

Trial data showed that more than half (53.5%) of detected cancers were in stages I or II, while nearly 70% were found before reaching stage IV. The test also achieved a 99.6% accuracy rate in ruling out cancer in people who were healthy, minimizing false positives.

Sir Harpal explained that Pathfinder 2 was designed to evaluate the test in real-world conditions. “What we wanted to assess was the added value of Galleri over existing screening methods. One of the most exciting outcomes is that it detected seven times as many cancers as all other screening programmes combined,” he said.

The trial included more than 23,000 participants from the U.S. and Canada who had no symptoms of cancer, with results presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress in Berlin.

Meanwhile, an NHS Galleri trial is currently underway, with results expected next year. According to Sir Harpal, if successful, the test could enable doctors to detect cancer much earlier—especially for types that currently lack screening options, such as pancreatic, liver, ovarian, and head and neck cancers.

“If we can find more cancers before they present clinically, we can treat them earlier and, in many cases, more effectively,” he said. “This could make a substantial difference to cancer outcomes.”

He added that the test’s ability to pinpoint the affected organ makes diagnosis faster and more efficient. “If someone presents with abdominal pain, Galleri can help clinicians determine whether it’s ovarian, pancreatic, colorectal cancer—or not cancer at all. That means we can make much better use of limited diagnostic capacity.”

Experts suggest that Galleri would be most effective as an annual test for people aged 50 and above, when cancer risk increases. “Our analysis suggests it’s more cost-effective from age 50 upwards,” Sir Harpal noted.

Josh Ofman, president at Grail, described the findings as “extremely compelling,” adding that “around three-quarters of Galleri-detected cancers currently have no recommended screening tests.”

However, some researchers urged caution. Professor Anna Schuh of the University of Oxford warned that the test is “not yet perfect,” noting: “Almost half of the time, the test gets it wrong when it gives a positive result. This is disappointing, as it’s only fractionally better than tossing a coin.”

Professor Clare Turnbull from the Institute of Cancer Research, London, said further studies are needed to determine whether the test ultimately reduces cancer mortality. Meanwhile, Professor Nitzan Rosenfeld of the Barts Cancer Institute called the results “impressive” and said the 62% accuracy was “very encouraging,” though sensitivity still varies across cancer types.

Despite the cautions, experts agree that Galleri represents a significant step forward in early cancer detection—offering hope that more cancers can be found and treated before they become life-threatening.

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is the team responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing news and feature content on Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, and responsibly sourced information. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team researches, writes, edits, and publishes news and feature content covering Nigerian current affairs, entertainment, sports, health, business, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide accurate, timely, and responsibly sourced information and update our reports when credible new information becomes available. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Team BIo: The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Editorial Policy: At Julian Daily Gist, our goal is to provide readers with timely, useful, accurate, and responsibly presented news and information. We cover Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, human-interest stories, and other topics of interest to our readers. 1. Accuracy and Verification We make reasonable efforts to ensure that information published on Julian Daily Gist is accurate and presented in its proper context. Before publishing a report, our editorial team makes reasonable efforts to: - Check information against credible sources. - Verify names, dates, locations, figures, and other important details. - Attribute information to the appropriate source. - Distinguish confirmed facts from allegations, claims, opinions, and speculation. - Update stories when credible new information becomes available. When information cannot be independently verified, we make this clear to readers rather than presenting it as established fact. 2. Sources We use a range of sources, including: - Official government statements. - Police and security agencies. - Courts and legal documents. - Government agencies. - Direct interviews and statements. - Reputable news organizations. - Publicly available records. - Verified social media accounts and statements. When an article relies substantially on information reported by another publication, we aim to clearly attribute the information to that source. We do not intentionally present another publication's reporting as our own. 3. Originality Julian Daily Gist aims to provide original editorial value. When we report information that has already been published elsewhere, we seek to add value through original writing, context, verification, analysis, additional information, or other useful material. We do not intentionally copy and republish articles from other websites without appropriate attribution and meaningful editorial contribution. 4. Allegations and Sensitive Claims When reporting allegations involving individuals or organizations, we make reasonable efforts to clearly identify allegations as allegations. We avoid presenting unproven accusations as established facts. Where relevant, we seek or include responses from the person, organization, or representative concerned. For criminal matters, we recognize that an allegation, arrest, charge, or accusation does not by itself establish guilt. 5. Headlines Our headlines are intended to accurately reflect the content of our articles. We aim to avoid deliberately misleading headlines, fabricated claims, or headlines that exaggerate facts simply to generate clicks. 6. Corrections and Updates We take corrections seriously. If we discover that an article contains a significant factual error, we may correct or update the article as appropriate. Readers who identify an error are encouraged to contact us with specific information supporting the correction. Where appropriate, significant corrections or updates may be noted within the article. 7. Editorial Independence Editorial decisions are made independently of advertisers, sponsors, commercial partners, and other external interests. Advertising or sponsorship does not automatically influence our editorial decisions or the opinions expressed by our writers. 8. Sponsored and Promotional Content Where Julian Daily Gist publishes sponsored, paid, or promotional content, we aim to clearly identify it as such. Sponsored content does not necessarily represent the independent editorial views of Julian Daily Gist. 9. Conflicts of Interest Our editorial team should avoid situations where personal, financial, or other interests could improperly influence reporting. Where a relevant conflict of interest exists, we aim to disclose it when appropriate. 10. Use of Images and Other Media We aim to use images, videos, graphics, and other media responsibly and with appropriate permission, licensing, attribution, or other lawful basis where required. We do not knowingly use copyrighted material in a manner that infringes the rights of its owner. If you believe that material published on Julian Daily Gist infringes your copyright, please contact us so that we can review the matter. 11. Artificial Intelligence We may use technology and artificial intelligence tools to assist with certain editorial tasks, such as research support, proofreading, formatting, transcription, or drafting assistance. However, AI-generated information is not treated as automatically accurate. Content remains subject to human review, editing, fact-checking, and editorial judgment before publication where appropriate. We do not intentionally publish fabricated information generated by AI. 12. Privacy and Personal Information We take reasonable care when handling personal information and avoid publishing unnecessary private information about individuals. Sensitive personal information is published only when there is a legitimate public-interest reason and where appropriate. Our handling of visitor information is explained in our Privacy Policy. 13. Opinion and Commentary Opinion articles and commentary represent the views expressed by the respective writer or contributor. Where appropriate, opinion content will be identified as commentary, analysis, or opinion so that readers can distinguish it from straightforward news reporting. 14. User-Generated Content Comments and other material submitted by readers may be moderated. We reserve the right to remove content that is unlawful, defamatory, abusive, discriminatory, misleading, threatening, spam-related, or otherwise inappropriate. User comments do not necessarily represent the views of Julian Daily Gist. 15. Our Commitment We are committed to improving the quality, accuracy, transparency, and usefulness of Julian Daily Gist. As our publication grows, we will continue reviewing our editorial practices and updating this policy when necessary. 16. Contact and Corrections If you have a correction, clarification, complaint, copyright concern, or question about our editorial practices, please contact us through our Contact Us page.

You May Also Like