A new theory suggests that the Great Pyramid of Giza may have been designed not only as a monumental tomb, but also as a way of preserving mathematical and astronomical knowledge through its dimensions and proportions.
Independent researcher Sefy Levy argues in a paper published in August that measurements associated with the pyramid’s height, base, sloping sides and overall shape may form a numerical system connected to lunar, planetary and calendar cycles. Levy’s paper, titled The Pyramid as Memory Hypothesis, has not yet been peer reviewed.
Levy argues that the pyramid’s dimensions may have been deliberately selected to preserve knowledge in a form capable of surviving long after its builders were gone. “The pyramid was not built to last forever because it contained something valuable…it was because it was something valuable,” Levy wrote, describing the monument as “the knowledge…made stone.”
Mathematical and Astronomical Clues
According to Levy, his conclusions come from examining key dimensions of the Great Pyramid and dividing them using fractions believed to have been used by ancient Egyptians.
One calculation produces the figure 27.5, which Levy says is close to the approximately 27.55-day cycle associated with the Moon reaching its closest point to Earth.
Another figure, 70, is interpreted by Levy as potentially corresponding to the interval between the heliacal setting and rising of Sirius, the brightest star visible in Earth’s night sky. He also argues that other calculations produce figures resembling recurring cycles associated with planets such as Venus and Jupiter.
Levy further claims that the pyramid’s proportions produce values close to mathematical constants including pi and the golden ratio.
However, these interpretations remain part of Levy’s hypothesis. There is currently no established evidence that the pyramid’s builders deliberately encoded these astronomical or mathematical values into its design.
The Pyramid and the Ancient Egyptian Creation Myth
Levy’s broader theory also draws on ancient Egyptian creation traditions associated with Heliopolis.
According to the creation account referenced in his paper, the world initially consisted of a dark, endless body of water known as Nun. From these waters emerged a sacred mound of land called the benben. The creator god Atum was then believed to have brought himself into existence from the mound.
Levy proposes that the pyramids may have been physical representations of this primordial mound.
He also suggests another possibility: that the pyramid’s distinctive shape could have been inspired by a landscape associated with the distant ancestors of ancient Egyptians. He identifies this possible ancestral landscape as the Eye of the Sahara, also known as the Richat Structure, in Mauritania.
Under this interpretation, communities may once have lived in the region before environmental changes altered the landscape and reduced available water sources, potentially contributing to migration eastward toward the Nile.
Levy suggests that later generations may have constructed the pyramids partly as monuments to an ancestral homeland.
A Theory Still Awaiting Evidence
The idea is one of several recent attempts to explain the symbolism, purpose and construction of the Great Pyramid, also known as the Pyramid of Khufu.
Separate research published earlier this year proposed that the pyramid may have been constructed using a multi-channel ramp system incorporated into its edges. That study suggested that workers could have used a spiral ramp arrangement that was progressively covered as additional layers of the pyramid were completed.
While such research offers new ways of thinking about how and why the Great Pyramid was built, Levy’s claims about encoded astronomical and mathematical knowledge remain speculative.
Until the hypothesis receives further scrutiny and independent research, it should be regarded as an intriguing interpretation rather than established evidence of the intentions of the pyramid’s builders.
The Great Pyramid has survived for thousands of years, but whether it was deliberately designed as a kind of mathematical and astronomical “memory” remains an open question.
Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team
Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is the team responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing news and feature content on Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, and responsibly sourced information.
The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team researches, writes, edits, and publishes news and feature content covering Nigerian current affairs, entertainment, sports, health, business, lifestyle, and human-interest stories.
We aim to provide accurate, timely, and responsibly sourced information and update our reports when credible new information becomes available.
The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist.
Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories.
We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available.
We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story.
Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories.
Team BIo:
The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist.
Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories.
We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available.
We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story.
Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories.
Editorial Policy:
At Julian Daily Gist, our goal is to provide readers with timely, useful, accurate, and responsibly presented news and information.
We cover Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, human-interest stories, and other topics of interest to our readers.
1. Accuracy and Verification
We make reasonable efforts to ensure that information published on Julian Daily Gist is accurate and presented in its proper context.
Before publishing a report, our editorial team makes reasonable efforts to:
- Check information against credible sources.
- Verify names, dates, locations, figures, and other important details.
- Attribute information to the appropriate source.
- Distinguish confirmed facts from allegations, claims, opinions, and speculation.
- Update stories when credible new information becomes available.
When information cannot be independently verified, we make this clear to readers rather than presenting it as established fact.
2. Sources
We use a range of sources, including:
- Official government statements.
- Police and security agencies.
- Courts and legal documents.
- Government agencies.
- Direct interviews and statements.
- Reputable news organizations.
- Publicly available records.
- Verified social media accounts and statements.
When an article relies substantially on information reported by another publication, we aim to clearly attribute the information to that source.
We do not intentionally present another publication's reporting as our own.
3. Originality
Julian Daily Gist aims to provide original editorial value.
When we report information that has already been published elsewhere, we seek to add value through original writing, context, verification, analysis, additional information, or other useful material.
We do not intentionally copy and republish articles from other websites without appropriate attribution and meaningful editorial contribution.
4. Allegations and Sensitive Claims
When reporting allegations involving individuals or organizations, we make reasonable efforts to clearly identify allegations as allegations.
We avoid presenting unproven accusations as established facts.
Where relevant, we seek or include responses from the person, organization, or representative concerned.
For criminal matters, we recognize that an allegation, arrest, charge, or accusation does not by itself establish guilt.
5. Headlines
Our headlines are intended to accurately reflect the content of our articles.
We aim to avoid deliberately misleading headlines, fabricated claims, or headlines that exaggerate facts simply to generate clicks.
6. Corrections and Updates
We take corrections seriously.
If we discover that an article contains a significant factual error, we may correct or update the article as appropriate.
Readers who identify an error are encouraged to contact us with specific information supporting the correction.
Where appropriate, significant corrections or updates may be noted within the article.
7. Editorial Independence
Editorial decisions are made independently of advertisers, sponsors, commercial partners, and other external interests.
Advertising or sponsorship does not automatically influence our editorial decisions or the opinions expressed by our writers.
8. Sponsored and Promotional Content
Where Julian Daily Gist publishes sponsored, paid, or promotional content, we aim to clearly identify it as such.
Sponsored content does not necessarily represent the independent editorial views of Julian Daily Gist.
9. Conflicts of Interest
Our editorial team should avoid situations where personal, financial, or other interests could improperly influence reporting.
Where a relevant conflict of interest exists, we aim to disclose it when appropriate.
10. Use of Images and Other Media
We aim to use images, videos, graphics, and other media responsibly and with appropriate permission, licensing, attribution, or other lawful basis where required.
We do not knowingly use copyrighted material in a manner that infringes the rights of its owner.
If you believe that material published on Julian Daily Gist infringes your copyright, please contact us so that we can review the matter.
11. Artificial Intelligence
We may use technology and artificial intelligence tools to assist with certain editorial tasks, such as research support, proofreading, formatting, transcription, or drafting assistance.
However, AI-generated information is not treated as automatically accurate. Content remains subject to human review, editing, fact-checking, and editorial judgment before publication where appropriate.
We do not intentionally publish fabricated information generated by AI.
12. Privacy and Personal Information
We take reasonable care when handling personal information and avoid publishing unnecessary private information about individuals.
Sensitive personal information is published only when there is a legitimate public-interest reason and where appropriate.
Our handling of visitor information is explained in our Privacy Policy.
13. Opinion and Commentary
Opinion articles and commentary represent the views expressed by the respective writer or contributor.
Where appropriate, opinion content will be identified as commentary, analysis, or opinion so that readers can distinguish it from straightforward news reporting.
14. User-Generated Content
Comments and other material submitted by readers may be moderated.
We reserve the right to remove content that is unlawful, defamatory, abusive, discriminatory, misleading, threatening, spam-related, or otherwise inappropriate.
User comments do not necessarily represent the views of Julian Daily Gist.
15. Our Commitment
We are committed to improving the quality, accuracy, transparency, and usefulness of Julian Daily Gist.
As our publication grows, we will continue reviewing our editorial practices and updating this policy when necessary.
16. Contact and Corrections
If you have a correction, clarification, complaint, copyright concern, or question about our editorial practices, please contact us through our Contact Us page.
