Failed CCTV Project: Court Orders Buhari Govt To Account For $460m Loan

A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the government of President Muhammadu Buhari to “account for the spending of $460 million Chinese loan to fund the failed Abuja Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) project.”

The court also ordered the government to “publish the total amount of money paid to Chinese and local companies and contractors, specific details and the implementation of the project.”

Hon. Justice Emeka Nwite made the orders while delivering judgment in a Freedom of Information suit number: FHC/ABJ/CS/1447/2019 brought by Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP).

This was contained in a statement on Sunday by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) signed by its deputy director, Kolawole Oluwadare.

According to the statement, the suit followed the disclosure in 2019 by the Minister of Finance, Zainab Ahmed that “Nigeria was servicing the loan,” adding that she had ‘no explanations on the status of the project.’ She reportedly said, “We are servicing the loan. I have no information on the status of the CCTV project.”

In his judgment, Justice Nwite agreed with SERAP that “there is a reasonable cause of action against the government. Accounting for the spending of the $460 million Chinese loan is in the interest of the public. It will be inimical for the court to refuse SERAP’s application for judicial review of the government’s action.

Justice Nwite also said that, “The Minister of Finance is in charge of the finance of the country and cannot by any stretch of imagination be oblivious of the amount of money paid to the contractors for the Abuja CCTV contract and the money meant for the construction of the headquarters of the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB).

Justice Nwite also ordered the government “to provide the details clarifying whether the sum of N1.5 billion Naira paid for the failed contract meant to construct the headquarters of the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) was part of another loan obtained from China.”

Justice Nwite’s judgment, read in part: “SERAP’s core objectives are to promote human rights, transparency and accountability and anti-corruption in Nigeria.”

“I am of the humble view that there is a reasonable cause of action against the government [through the Minister of Finance] and I so hold that SERAP has made out a case to be entitled to the reliefs sought.

“The law is well settled that where a document or letter is sent by post, it is the law that same is taken or presumed to have been delivered.

“Following this principle of law and relying on exhibit OS2, SERAP’s Freedom of Information request sent to Ms Ahmed is deemed to have been delivered. Therefore, the averment by the government [through her] that they were not served with the letter is hereby discountenanced. I so hold.”

Joined as defendants in the suit are Ms Ahmed and the Minister of Police Affairs.

Justice Nwite granted the following orders of mandamus against the Nigerian government:

An order of mandamus is hereby made directing and compelling the government [through the Minister of Finance] to provide and make available to SERAP information on the total amount of money paid to contractors, with specific details of names of companies local contractors involved, from the $460 million loan obtained in 2010 from China by the Federal Government of Nigeria to fund the failed Abuja CCTV contract.

An order of mandamus is hereby made directing and compelling the government [through the Minister of Finance] to provide the details of the local companies and Chinese contractors that have received funds from the $460 million loan for the finance of the Abuja CCTV contract as well as details of the status of implementation of the project.

An order of mandamus is hereby made directing and compelling the government [through the Minister of Finance] to provide the details clarifying whether the sum of N1.5 billion Naira mobilisation fee reportedly paid to the contractors for the construction of the Headquarters of the Code of Conduct Bureau in Abuja was part of another loan from China. This is the judgment of the court.

“The onus is now on President Buhari to immediately comply with the court’s orders. We commend Justice Nwite for his courage and wisdom, and urge President Buhari and Abubakar Malami, Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice to immediately obey the court orders,” SERAP deputy director said.

“This is a victory for justice, rule of law, transparency and accountability. The judgment shows the way forward in the fight against corruption and impunity of perpetrators. We will do everything within the law to ensure full compliance by President Buhari with this ground-breaking judgment on Chinese loans.

“We call on President Buhari to use the judgment as the basis for publishing details of spending of all Chinese loans and other loans obtained by his government since May 2015.”

Nigeria’s total borrowing from China climbed from $1.39 billion to $4.29 billion between June 2015 and December 2022, according to data from Debt Management Office (DMO).

Nigeria’s 2023-2025 Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) and Fiscal Strategy Paper (FSP) revealed earlier in the year that the federal government will spend N6.31 trillion on debt servicing in 2023, which amounts to about 74.6% of the government’s projected revenue of 8.46 trillion for the year.

Nigeria risks losing key national assets to China in the event that it defaults in paying back loans obtained from China.

According to a report, Nigeria may have defaulted on Chinese loan repayment and stands the risk of paying a penalty amounting to N41.31 billion. The report quoted the Debt Management Office (DMO), which said Nigeria has failed to fully service its debt to China, which has accumulated to N110.31 billion in the last two years.

It would be recalled that SERAP had in December 2019 filed a lawsuit against Ms Ahmed over failure to “disclose information and specific documents on the total amount of money paid to contractors from the $460 million loan obtained in 2010 from China to fund the apparently failed Abuja CCTV project.

The suit number, read in part: “Servicing Chinese loans for failed projects is double jeopardy for Nigerians—they can neither see nor benefit from the projects; yet, they are made to pay both the loans and the accrued interests.”

“The $460 million loan got for the failed Abuja CCTV project and the N1.5 billion for the construction of CCB headquarters, which may be part of another Chinese loan, may have been mismanaged or stolen, and in any case, remain unaccounted for.

“Transparency in the spending of Chinese loans is good for everyone, as this would help to increase the effectiveness, legitimacy, and contribution of the loans to the development of public goods and services, and the general public interests.

“The information being requested does not come within the purview of the types of information exempted from disclosure under the Act. The Respondent has no legally justifiable reason for refusing to provide SERAP with the information requested.

“Democracy cannot flourish if governments operate in secrecy. The citizens are entitled to know how the commonwealth is being utilized, managed and administered in a democratic setting.”

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is the team responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing news and feature content on Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, and responsibly sourced information. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team researches, writes, edits, and publishes news and feature content covering Nigerian current affairs, entertainment, sports, health, business, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide accurate, timely, and responsibly sourced information and update our reports when credible new information becomes available. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Team BIo: The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Editorial Policy: At Julian Daily Gist, our goal is to provide readers with timely, useful, accurate, and responsibly presented news and information. We cover Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, human-interest stories, and other topics of interest to our readers. 1. Accuracy and Verification We make reasonable efforts to ensure that information published on Julian Daily Gist is accurate and presented in its proper context. Before publishing a report, our editorial team makes reasonable efforts to: - Check information against credible sources. - Verify names, dates, locations, figures, and other important details. - Attribute information to the appropriate source. - Distinguish confirmed facts from allegations, claims, opinions, and speculation. - Update stories when credible new information becomes available. When information cannot be independently verified, we make this clear to readers rather than presenting it as established fact. 2. Sources We use a range of sources, including: - Official government statements. - Police and security agencies. - Courts and legal documents. - Government agencies. - Direct interviews and statements. - Reputable news organizations. - Publicly available records. - Verified social media accounts and statements. When an article relies substantially on information reported by another publication, we aim to clearly attribute the information to that source. We do not intentionally present another publication's reporting as our own. 3. Originality Julian Daily Gist aims to provide original editorial value. When we report information that has already been published elsewhere, we seek to add value through original writing, context, verification, analysis, additional information, or other useful material. We do not intentionally copy and republish articles from other websites without appropriate attribution and meaningful editorial contribution. 4. Allegations and Sensitive Claims When reporting allegations involving individuals or organizations, we make reasonable efforts to clearly identify allegations as allegations. We avoid presenting unproven accusations as established facts. Where relevant, we seek or include responses from the person, organization, or representative concerned. For criminal matters, we recognize that an allegation, arrest, charge, or accusation does not by itself establish guilt. 5. Headlines Our headlines are intended to accurately reflect the content of our articles. We aim to avoid deliberately misleading headlines, fabricated claims, or headlines that exaggerate facts simply to generate clicks. 6. Corrections and Updates We take corrections seriously. If we discover that an article contains a significant factual error, we may correct or update the article as appropriate. Readers who identify an error are encouraged to contact us with specific information supporting the correction. Where appropriate, significant corrections or updates may be noted within the article. 7. Editorial Independence Editorial decisions are made independently of advertisers, sponsors, commercial partners, and other external interests. Advertising or sponsorship does not automatically influence our editorial decisions or the opinions expressed by our writers. 8. Sponsored and Promotional Content Where Julian Daily Gist publishes sponsored, paid, or promotional content, we aim to clearly identify it as such. Sponsored content does not necessarily represent the independent editorial views of Julian Daily Gist. 9. Conflicts of Interest Our editorial team should avoid situations where personal, financial, or other interests could improperly influence reporting. Where a relevant conflict of interest exists, we aim to disclose it when appropriate. 10. Use of Images and Other Media We aim to use images, videos, graphics, and other media responsibly and with appropriate permission, licensing, attribution, or other lawful basis where required. We do not knowingly use copyrighted material in a manner that infringes the rights of its owner. If you believe that material published on Julian Daily Gist infringes your copyright, please contact us so that we can review the matter. 11. Artificial Intelligence We may use technology and artificial intelligence tools to assist with certain editorial tasks, such as research support, proofreading, formatting, transcription, or drafting assistance. However, AI-generated information is not treated as automatically accurate. Content remains subject to human review, editing, fact-checking, and editorial judgment before publication where appropriate. We do not intentionally publish fabricated information generated by AI. 12. Privacy and Personal Information We take reasonable care when handling personal information and avoid publishing unnecessary private information about individuals. Sensitive personal information is published only when there is a legitimate public-interest reason and where appropriate. Our handling of visitor information is explained in our Privacy Policy. 13. Opinion and Commentary Opinion articles and commentary represent the views expressed by the respective writer or contributor. Where appropriate, opinion content will be identified as commentary, analysis, or opinion so that readers can distinguish it from straightforward news reporting. 14. User-Generated Content Comments and other material submitted by readers may be moderated. We reserve the right to remove content that is unlawful, defamatory, abusive, discriminatory, misleading, threatening, spam-related, or otherwise inappropriate. User comments do not necessarily represent the views of Julian Daily Gist. 15. Our Commitment We are committed to improving the quality, accuracy, transparency, and usefulness of Julian Daily Gist. As our publication grows, we will continue reviewing our editorial practices and updating this policy when necessary. 16. Contact and Corrections If you have a correction, clarification, complaint, copyright concern, or question about our editorial practices, please contact us through our Contact Us page.

You May Also Like