Aug 6, 2023Aug 6, 2023

SERAP Sues Tinubu Over Failure to Disclose Spending Details of N400bn Fuel Subsidy Savings

Posted By: Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team 0 Comment

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has taken legal action against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu regarding the failure to disclose spending details of approximately N400 billion, which has been saved as a result of removing the subsidy on Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol.

This legal action comes in response to reports indicating that the Federal Government has accumulated N400 billion in savings within the four weeks since implementing the removal of the petrol subsidy policy.

The lawsuit, identified as suit number FHC/L/CS/1514/2023, was filed last week at the Federal High Court in Lagos. SERAP is seeking an “order of mandamus” to direct and compel President Tinubu to publish the specific details of how the N400 billion has been spent since the removal of the petrol subsidy on May 29, 2023.

Additionally, SERAP is requesting a further “order of mandamus” to direct and compel President Tinubu to furnish details regarding the plans for utilizing the savings from the petrol subsidy removal, including information on the specific projects on which these funds will be allocated.

The main objective behind this legal action is to promote transparency, accountability, and public oversight regarding the government’s financial decisions related to the removal of the petrol subsidy and the allocation of the resulting savings.

SERAP is also seeking an order of mandamus to compel President Tinubu to provide transparent and detailed information regarding the mechanisms that have been implemented to ensure that the savings from the removal of subsidy on petrol are not diverted into private pockets.

In the suit, SERAP argues that Nigerians have the legitimate right to know how these savings are being utilized. By disclosing the spending details of the savings, it would significantly reduce the risks of corruption in the allocation and expenditure of these funds. Transparency in the usage of public funds is crucial for fostering accountability and trust in the government’s actions.

SERAP is arguing that “The Tinubu government has a legal obligation to ensure that the savings from the removal of subsidy on petrol are dedicated exclusively for the benefit of the 137 million underprivileged Nigerians who are bearing the brunt of the removal.”

SERAP is also arguing that, “Transparency in the spending of the savings from subsidy removal is crucial to safeguard the fundamental interests of the citizens and the public interest.”

According to SERAP, “There is a risk that the savings from subsidy removal may be embezzled, misappropriated, or diverted into private pockets.”

The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare, Ms. Adelanke Aremo, and Ms. Valentina Adegoke, states: “Ensuring transparency would foster public trust and confidence that these savings would be utilized for the benefit of Nigerians.”

“The Nigerian Constitution, 1999 [as amended], Freedom of Information Act, and the country’s anti-corruption and human rights obligations emphasize the principle that citizens should have access to information regarding their government’s activities.”

The prevention of corruption in the spending of savings resulting from the removal of subsidy on petrol and addressing the challenges arising from it are vital public interests.

The government, led by Tinubu, holds a legal obligation to safeguard individuals against threats posed to human rights due to subsidy removal and effectively handle its aftermath.

To avoid undermining the rights of Nigerians and exacerbating poverty, it is imperative that the government is compelled and directed to publish the details of spending the savings from subsidy removal.

The National Social Safety Net Programme (NASSP) and its expenditure have mostly been shrouded in secrecy, necessitating the transparent publication of the N400bn savings and other subsequent savings from subsidy removal. This step will hold public officials accountable for their duties.

By ensuring transparency and accountability in the spending of the N400bn saved from subsidy removal, and subsequent savings, the government can utilize these funds to aid impoverished Nigerians in overcoming the adverse effects of such removal.

Moreover, this action will prevent inflicting double jeopardy on socially and economically vulnerable Nigerians, an outcome that would be morally repugnant.

The lack of transparency and accountability in the spending of subsidy removal savings directly threatens fundamental human rights, which the government is obligated to protect.

The Tinubu government holds legal responsibilities to address the effects of subsidy removal on the human rights of 137 million poor Nigerians and mitigate the dire consequences disproportionately impacting them.

The removal of subsidy on petrol continues to negatively affect poor Nigerians, violating their right to an adequate standard of living.

Years of corruption allegations and mismanagement in public fund spending, coupled with impunity for perpetrators, have eroded public trust in governments at all levels.

The Freedom of Information Act, Section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution, article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantee everyone the right to information, including details on the spending of the N400bn and other savings from subsidy removal.

According to the combined reading of the Nigerian Constitution, the Freedom of Information Act, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the government is obligated to widely publish the details of how the N400bn and other savings from subsidy removal are spent.

Section 13 of the Nigerian Constitution explicitly demands the government to conform to, observe, and apply the provisions of Chapter 2 of the constitution, while Section 15(5) imposes the responsibility to ‘abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power’ in the country.

Under Section 16(1) of the Constitution, the government is responsible for securing the maximum welfare, freedom, and happiness of every citizen on the basis of social justice and equality of status and opportunity.

Section 16(2) further emphasizes that ‘the material resources of the nation are harnessed and distributed as best as possible to serve the common good.’

Similarly, articles 5 and 9 of the UN Convention against Corruption also impose legal obligations on the government to ensure proper management of public affairs and funds and promote sound and transparent administration of public affairs.

The forthcoming hearing date for the suit is yet to be fixed.

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is the team responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing news and feature content on Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, and responsibly sourced information. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team researches, writes, edits, and publishes news and feature content covering Nigerian current affairs, entertainment, sports, health, business, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide accurate, timely, and responsibly sourced information and update our reports when credible new information becomes available. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Team BIo: The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Editorial Policy: At Julian Daily Gist, our goal is to provide readers with timely, useful, accurate, and responsibly presented news and information. We cover Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, human-interest stories, and other topics of interest to our readers. 1. Accuracy and Verification We make reasonable efforts to ensure that information published on Julian Daily Gist is accurate and presented in its proper context. Before publishing a report, our editorial team makes reasonable efforts to: - Check information against credible sources. - Verify names, dates, locations, figures, and other important details. - Attribute information to the appropriate source. - Distinguish confirmed facts from allegations, claims, opinions, and speculation. - Update stories when credible new information becomes available. When information cannot be independently verified, we make this clear to readers rather than presenting it as established fact. 2. Sources We use a range of sources, including: - Official government statements. - Police and security agencies. - Courts and legal documents. - Government agencies. - Direct interviews and statements. - Reputable news organizations. - Publicly available records. - Verified social media accounts and statements. When an article relies substantially on information reported by another publication, we aim to clearly attribute the information to that source. We do not intentionally present another publication's reporting as our own. 3. Originality Julian Daily Gist aims to provide original editorial value. When we report information that has already been published elsewhere, we seek to add value through original writing, context, verification, analysis, additional information, or other useful material. We do not intentionally copy and republish articles from other websites without appropriate attribution and meaningful editorial contribution. 4. Allegations and Sensitive Claims When reporting allegations involving individuals or organizations, we make reasonable efforts to clearly identify allegations as allegations. We avoid presenting unproven accusations as established facts. Where relevant, we seek or include responses from the person, organization, or representative concerned. For criminal matters, we recognize that an allegation, arrest, charge, or accusation does not by itself establish guilt. 5. Headlines Our headlines are intended to accurately reflect the content of our articles. We aim to avoid deliberately misleading headlines, fabricated claims, or headlines that exaggerate facts simply to generate clicks. 6. Corrections and Updates We take corrections seriously. If we discover that an article contains a significant factual error, we may correct or update the article as appropriate. Readers who identify an error are encouraged to contact us with specific information supporting the correction. Where appropriate, significant corrections or updates may be noted within the article. 7. Editorial Independence Editorial decisions are made independently of advertisers, sponsors, commercial partners, and other external interests. Advertising or sponsorship does not automatically influence our editorial decisions or the opinions expressed by our writers. 8. Sponsored and Promotional Content Where Julian Daily Gist publishes sponsored, paid, or promotional content, we aim to clearly identify it as such. Sponsored content does not necessarily represent the independent editorial views of Julian Daily Gist. 9. Conflicts of Interest Our editorial team should avoid situations where personal, financial, or other interests could improperly influence reporting. Where a relevant conflict of interest exists, we aim to disclose it when appropriate. 10. Use of Images and Other Media We aim to use images, videos, graphics, and other media responsibly and with appropriate permission, licensing, attribution, or other lawful basis where required. We do not knowingly use copyrighted material in a manner that infringes the rights of its owner. If you believe that material published on Julian Daily Gist infringes your copyright, please contact us so that we can review the matter. 11. Artificial Intelligence We may use technology and artificial intelligence tools to assist with certain editorial tasks, such as research support, proofreading, formatting, transcription, or drafting assistance. However, AI-generated information is not treated as automatically accurate. Content remains subject to human review, editing, fact-checking, and editorial judgment before publication where appropriate. We do not intentionally publish fabricated information generated by AI. 12. Privacy and Personal Information We take reasonable care when handling personal information and avoid publishing unnecessary private information about individuals. Sensitive personal information is published only when there is a legitimate public-interest reason and where appropriate. Our handling of visitor information is explained in our Privacy Policy. 13. Opinion and Commentary Opinion articles and commentary represent the views expressed by the respective writer or contributor. Where appropriate, opinion content will be identified as commentary, analysis, or opinion so that readers can distinguish it from straightforward news reporting. 14. User-Generated Content Comments and other material submitted by readers may be moderated. We reserve the right to remove content that is unlawful, defamatory, abusive, discriminatory, misleading, threatening, spam-related, or otherwise inappropriate. User comments do not necessarily represent the views of Julian Daily Gist. 15. Our Commitment We are committed to improving the quality, accuracy, transparency, and usefulness of Julian Daily Gist. As our publication grows, we will continue reviewing our editorial practices and updating this policy when necessary. 16. Contact and Corrections If you have a correction, clarification, complaint, copyright concern, or question about our editorial practices, please contact us through our Contact Us page.