Feb 6, 2023Feb 6, 2023

Juliangist- ZamfaraKaduna, Kogi, Govts Drag FG To Supreme Court Over Naira Scarcity

Posted By: Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team 0 Comment

Worried by the effects the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)’s naira redesign policy is having on the residents of their states, the governments of Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara have dragged the Federal government before the Supreme Court, seeking a restraining order to stop the full implementation of the policy.

In a motion ex-parte filed on their behalf by their lawyer, AbdulHakeem Uthman Mustapha (SAN), the three northern states are urging the apex court to grant them an interim injunction stopping the Federal Government either by itself or acting through the CBN, the commercial banks or its agents from carrying out its plan of ending the timeframe within which the now older versions of the 200, 500 and 1000 denominations of the Naira may no longer be legal tender on February 10, 2023.

The Plaintiffs in the suit are the three Attorneys-General and Commissioners of Justice of the three states, while the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), is the sole Respondent.

The Plaintiffs said that since the announcement of the new naira note policy, there has been an acute shortage in the supply of the new naira notes in Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara States and that citizens who have dutifully deposited their old naira notes have increasingly found it difficult and sometimes next to impossible to access new naira notes to go about their daily activities.

They also cited the inadequacy of the notice coupled with the haphazard manner in which the exercise is being carried out and the attendant hardship same is wrecking on Nigerians, which has been well acknowledged even by the Federal Government of Nigeria itself.

The Plaintiffs further maintained that the ten-day extension by the Federal Government is still insufficient to address the challenges bedeviling the policy.

Recall that over the weekend, the CBN Governor at a press conference held in Lagos insisted that that the apex bank will not extend the deadline for swapping old naira notes with the newly redesigned ones.

In the suit filed at the apex court, the Plaintiffs have also filed a motion on notice to abridge the time within which the Respondent may file and serve his Counter-Affidavit to this Suit and an order for an accelerated hearing of this matter.

The states are seeking a declaration that the Demonetization Policy of the Federation being currently carried out by the Central Bank of Nigeria under the directive of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is not in compliance with the extant provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), Central Bank of Nigeria Act, 2007 and actual laws on the subject.

They are also asking the court to make a declaration that the three-month notice given by the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Central Bank of Nigeria under the directive of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the expiration of which will render the old Banknotes inadmissible as legal tender, is in gross violation of the provisions of Section 20(3) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act 2007 which specifies that Reasonable Notice must be given before such a policy.

The Plaintiffs are also urging the court for a declaration that given the express provisions of Section 20(3) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act 2007, the Federal Government of Nigeria, through the Central Bank of Nigeria, has no powers to issue a timeline for the acceptance and redeeming of banknotes issued by the Bank, except as limited by Section 22(1) of the CBN Act 2007. The Central Bank shall at all times redeem its bank notes.

The Plaintiffs further want the court to direct the immediate suspension of the demonetisation of the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Central Bank of Nigeria under the directive of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria until it complies with the relevant provisions of the law.

In an affidavit filed in support of the suit and sworn to by the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Kaduna State, Aisha Dikko, she averred that although the naira redesign policy was introduced to encourage the cashless policy of the Federal government, it is not all transactions that can be conveniently carried out through electronic means.

She maintained that several transactions still require cash in exchange for goods and services hence the need for the Federal Government to have sufficient money available in circulation for the smooth running of the economy.

Dikko also pointed out that the Federal Government has embarked on the policy within a narrow and unworkable time frame, and this has adversely affected Nigerian citizens within Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara States as well as their Governments, especially as the newly redesigned naira notes are not available for use by the people as well as the State Governments.

“That the majority of the indigenes of the Plaintiffs’ states who reside in the rural areas have been unable to exchange or deposit their old naira notes as there are no banks in the rural areas where the majority of the population of the states reside.

“Most people in rural areas of the Plaintiffs’ states do not have bank accounts and have so far been unable to deposit their life savings which are still in the old naira notes.

“There is restiveness amongst the people in the various states because of the hardship being suffered by the people, and the situation will sooner than later degenerate into the breakdown of law and order.

“The Plaintiff State Governments cannot stand by as they are duty-bound to protect citizens in their states and prevent the breakdown of law and order.

“I know that if the Federal Government of Nigeria had given sufficient and reasonable time for the naira redesign policy, all the current hardship and loss being experienced by the Plaintiffs’ State Governments as well as people in the various states would have been avoided.

“I know that the 10-day extension by the Federal Government is still insufficient to address the challenges bedevilling the policy. I also understand that the Federal Government cannot bar Nigerians from redeeming their old naira notes at any time, even though the senior notes are no longer legal tender.

“Unless this Honourable Court intervenes, the Government and people of Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara State will continue to go through a lot of hardship and would ultimately suffer great loss as a result of the insufficient and unreasonable time within which the Federal Government is embarking on the ongoing currency redesign policy,” she stated.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team

Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is the team responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing news and feature content on Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, and responsibly sourced information. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team researches, writes, edits, and publishes news and feature content covering Nigerian current affairs, entertainment, sports, health, business, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide accurate, timely, and responsibly sourced information and update our reports when credible new information becomes available. The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Team BIo: The Julian Daily Gist Editorial Team is responsible for researching, writing, editing, and publishing content across Julian Daily Gist. Our coverage includes Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, and human-interest stories. We aim to provide readers with timely, accurate, useful, and responsibly sourced information. Our team makes reasonable efforts to verify important information, identify sources, distinguish allegations from confirmed facts, and update reports when credible new information becomes available. We also believe in transparency and accountability. Readers can contact our editorial team to report factual errors, request corrections, or provide additional information relevant to a published story. Editorial focus: News, current affairs, lifestyle, entertainment, sports, health, business, and human-interest stories. Editorial Policy: At Julian Daily Gist, our goal is to provide readers with timely, useful, accurate, and responsibly presented news and information. We cover Nigerian current affairs, politics, business, entertainment, sports, health, lifestyle, human-interest stories, and other topics of interest to our readers. 1. Accuracy and Verification We make reasonable efforts to ensure that information published on Julian Daily Gist is accurate and presented in its proper context. Before publishing a report, our editorial team makes reasonable efforts to: - Check information against credible sources. - Verify names, dates, locations, figures, and other important details. - Attribute information to the appropriate source. - Distinguish confirmed facts from allegations, claims, opinions, and speculation. - Update stories when credible new information becomes available. When information cannot be independently verified, we make this clear to readers rather than presenting it as established fact. 2. Sources We use a range of sources, including: - Official government statements. - Police and security agencies. - Courts and legal documents. - Government agencies. - Direct interviews and statements. - Reputable news organizations. - Publicly available records. - Verified social media accounts and statements. When an article relies substantially on information reported by another publication, we aim to clearly attribute the information to that source. We do not intentionally present another publication's reporting as our own. 3. Originality Julian Daily Gist aims to provide original editorial value. When we report information that has already been published elsewhere, we seek to add value through original writing, context, verification, analysis, additional information, or other useful material. We do not intentionally copy and republish articles from other websites without appropriate attribution and meaningful editorial contribution. 4. Allegations and Sensitive Claims When reporting allegations involving individuals or organizations, we make reasonable efforts to clearly identify allegations as allegations. We avoid presenting unproven accusations as established facts. Where relevant, we seek or include responses from the person, organization, or representative concerned. For criminal matters, we recognize that an allegation, arrest, charge, or accusation does not by itself establish guilt. 5. Headlines Our headlines are intended to accurately reflect the content of our articles. We aim to avoid deliberately misleading headlines, fabricated claims, or headlines that exaggerate facts simply to generate clicks. 6. Corrections and Updates We take corrections seriously. If we discover that an article contains a significant factual error, we may correct or update the article as appropriate. Readers who identify an error are encouraged to contact us with specific information supporting the correction. Where appropriate, significant corrections or updates may be noted within the article. 7. Editorial Independence Editorial decisions are made independently of advertisers, sponsors, commercial partners, and other external interests. Advertising or sponsorship does not automatically influence our editorial decisions or the opinions expressed by our writers. 8. Sponsored and Promotional Content Where Julian Daily Gist publishes sponsored, paid, or promotional content, we aim to clearly identify it as such. Sponsored content does not necessarily represent the independent editorial views of Julian Daily Gist. 9. Conflicts of Interest Our editorial team should avoid situations where personal, financial, or other interests could improperly influence reporting. Where a relevant conflict of interest exists, we aim to disclose it when appropriate. 10. Use of Images and Other Media We aim to use images, videos, graphics, and other media responsibly and with appropriate permission, licensing, attribution, or other lawful basis where required. We do not knowingly use copyrighted material in a manner that infringes the rights of its owner. If you believe that material published on Julian Daily Gist infringes your copyright, please contact us so that we can review the matter. 11. Artificial Intelligence We may use technology and artificial intelligence tools to assist with certain editorial tasks, such as research support, proofreading, formatting, transcription, or drafting assistance. However, AI-generated information is not treated as automatically accurate. Content remains subject to human review, editing, fact-checking, and editorial judgment before publication where appropriate. We do not intentionally publish fabricated information generated by AI. 12. Privacy and Personal Information We take reasonable care when handling personal information and avoid publishing unnecessary private information about individuals. Sensitive personal information is published only when there is a legitimate public-interest reason and where appropriate. Our handling of visitor information is explained in our Privacy Policy. 13. Opinion and Commentary Opinion articles and commentary represent the views expressed by the respective writer or contributor. Where appropriate, opinion content will be identified as commentary, analysis, or opinion so that readers can distinguish it from straightforward news reporting. 14. User-Generated Content Comments and other material submitted by readers may be moderated. We reserve the right to remove content that is unlawful, defamatory, abusive, discriminatory, misleading, threatening, spam-related, or otherwise inappropriate. User comments do not necessarily represent the views of Julian Daily Gist. 15. Our Commitment We are committed to improving the quality, accuracy, transparency, and usefulness of Julian Daily Gist. As our publication grows, we will continue reviewing our editorial practices and updating this policy when necessary. 16. Contact and Corrections If you have a correction, clarification, complaint, copyright concern, or question about our editorial practices, please contact us through our Contact Us page.