Japan to Position Counter-Strike Missiles Closer to China

0 0
Read Time:1 Minute, 26 Second

Japan will deploy a batch of long-range counter-strike missiles in its southwestern region near China by the end of March, government officials confirmed.

The Japan Ground Self-Defense Force plans to position its Type 12 surface-to-ship missile in Kumamoto on the island of Kyushu. Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara told reporters that once preparations are complete, the Ministry of Defense will brief local residents about the deployment.

“I have been told that once the necessary preparation has been made, the ministry of defence will brief local residents,” Kihara said during a regular government briefing. The Type 12 missile reportedly has a range of around 1,000 kilometres (620 miles), giving Japan the ability to strike targets at greater distances.

The deployment comes as Japan seeks to strengthen its military capabilities amid growing Chinese naval activity in the East China Sea. Tokyo has been developing a “counter-strike” capability designed to allow it to target enemy bases if Japan itself were directly attacked.

Tensions between Japan and China have also risen since Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggested in November that Tokyo could intervene militarily if Taiwan were attacked. Beijing considers Taiwan part of its territory and has repeatedly warned that it does not rule out the use of force to assert control over the island.

Following Takaichi’s remarks, China reportedly increased economic pressure on Japan and discouraged Chinese tourists from visiting the country.

Local media reported that Japan’s ground forces delivered a missile launcher to Kumamoto overnight without prior notice to local communities, prompting protests outside a nearby military base. Critics argue that deploying the missiles could turn the region into a potential target in the event of a military conflict.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Share:

You May Also Like

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *